TY -的T1 -编者注:Cognitive-Driven日常生活活动障碍的预测在帕金森病痴呆:一项纵向队列研究JF -神经学乔-神经病学SP - 399 LP - 399 - 10.1212 / WNL。首页0000000000206892六世- 100 - 8 AU -阿丽亚娜刘易斯盟Aravind Ganesh AU -史蒂文Galetta Y1 - 2023/02/21 UR - //www.ez-admanager.com/content首页/100/8/399.1.abstract N2 -在“Cognitive-Driven日常生活活动障碍的预测在帕金森病痴呆:纵向队列研究,”贝克尔等人报告,尽管40%的268名帕金森病(PD)患者有轻度认知障碍(MCI)基线,164病人后随访完成3.78±0.84年,33%有MCI和10%的患有老年痴呆症。病人在这项研究中使用功能活动进行评估问卷(FAQ)区分认知障碍和运动贡献工具性日常生活活动的性能(IADL)。卡斯滕问题常见问题的结果如何与蒙特利尔认知评估的结果(MoCA)和这些分数是否可以互换使用。卡斯滕博士还提到了之前的一项研究发现,统一帕金森病评定量表是适度与美国华人博物馆。贝克报告有一个弱到中度相关性FAQ和MoCA分数在基线和随访。然而,尽管这些评估之间有一些重叠,贝克尔不相信他们应该交替使用,因为MoCA措施一般认知而FAQ措施认知贡献IADL障碍。这个交易凸显出重要的方法论考虑当筛查PD认知能力的下降。在“Cognitive-Driven日常生活活动障碍的预测在帕金森病痴呆:纵向队列研究,”贝克尔等人报告,尽管40%的268名帕金森病(PD)患者有轻度认知障碍(MCI)基线,164名患者完成随访3.78±0.84年后,33%的人MCI和10%的患有老年痴呆症。病人在这项研究中使用功能活动进行评估问卷(FAQ)区分认知障碍和运动贡献工具性日常生活活动的性能(IADL)。 Kasten questions how the results of the FAQ compared with results of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and whether these scores could be used interchangeably. Dr. Kasten also cites a prior study that found that the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale was moderately correlated with the MoCA. Becker reports there was a weak to moderate correlation between FAQ and MoCA scores at both baseline and follow-up. However, although there is some overlap between these assessments, Becker does not believe they should be used interchangeably because MoCA measures general cognition while the FAQ measures cognitive contributions to IADL impairment. This exchange highlights important methodological considerations when screening for cognitive decline in PD. ER -