RT期刊文章SR电子T1医生之间的性别表示作者开发的实践指南,背书,或由美国神经病学学会肯定了摩根富林明神经病学神经学乔FD Lippincott Williams &威尔金斯SP e465 OP e472 10.1212 / WNL。首页100签证官0000000000200567是5 A1林赛·罗斯A1凯瑟琳哈西特A1彼得·布朗A1伊丽莎白Spurgeon A1瑞切尔马修A1加布里埃尔Bal A1默罕默德沙札姆侯赛因A1 Amarilis马丁A1朱莉·k·银A1玛丽Rensel年2023 UL //www.ez-admanager.com/content/100/5/e465.abstract AB背景和目标来评估美国神经学学院(长)推荐实践指南(后卫)股本在医生之间的性别表示作者。首页本横断式研究方法包括AAN-recommended PG出版物从1月1日,2015年,2020年12月31日。作者度和性别被2评论者使用发布和/或网上搜索。性别确定代词或照片。性别表示与美国医学院协会学术神经病学家(对象)数据。数据分析使用Z测试2比例和描述性统计。结果对象为基准报告学术女性神经学家表示35%的专业,2015年38%,2018年和2020年的39%。我们确认68独特的PG出版物709医生作者,31%(223)女性,68%(484)男性,0.3%(2)性别不能被识别。代表的女性医生很低在PG作者所有基准,明显对2018年和2020年(p < 0.01)。医生第一作者,女性明显弱势所有基准(18% (12/65),p < 0.01)。 Representation of women physicians was lower when men physicians were first authors vs women physicians (31% [161/524] vs 43% [50/118], p = 0.02). Among subspecialties with 10+ PGs, women physician authorship was highest in child neurology (48% [57/120]) and lowest in stroke and vascular neurology (16% [18/113]).Discussion We found that women physicians were underrepresented as authors of AAN–recommended PGs. This suggests a missed opportunity for neurology because PGs that include expertise from women physicians may improve care and translation into practice. In addition, women physicians lose out on professional development from authorship. Further research is needed to understand causality and address gaps.AAMC=Association of American Medical Colleges; AAN=American Academy of Neurology; ISD=interorganizational structural discrimination; PG=Practice Guideline