PT -期刊文章盟费尔南多Vanderlinde桑托斯AU -她Caccese AU -费利佩•山口盟-约翰Jeka TI -重复头影响感官的影响权重的碰撞大学生运动员援助- 10.1212/01. wnl.0000581080.22077.74 DP - 2019 10月01 TA -神经病学PG - S25 S26 VI - 93 IP - 14补充1 4099 - //www.ez-admanager.com/content/93/14_Supplement_1/S25.2.short 4100 - http://n.neur首页ology.org/content/93/14_Supplement_1/S25.2.full所以Neurology2019 10月01;93 AB -客观比较感觉大学之间的直立的姿态重新碰撞和非接触式运动的运动员。背景重复的潜在副作用的影响(开展)通过日常接触碰撞运动参与已成为重大公共卫生问题。设计/方法30男大学生运动员按运动类型分组,包括碰撞(n = 15, 21.2±2年,85.9±13.8公斤,179.7±8.2厘米)和非接触式(n = 15, 20.8±2.1年,72.9±4.8公斤,178.3±4.3厘米)体育运动员。参与者进行了资产评估;他们有经验的同时扰动视觉、前庭和躯体感觉系统。500年的视觉刺激由金字塔显示在一个虚拟现实的洞穴,翻译在前后方向上在0.2赫兹正弦波形。前庭刺激包括binaural-monopolar前庭神经电刺激(问)0.36赫兹的正弦波形。躯体感觉刺激包括双边跟腱在0.28赫兹在广场振动波形以同样的开/关时间。不同的频率为每个模式选择,这样我们可以计算获得每个独立的刺激。 There were four conditions: two conditions of each high amplitude (0.2 m) and low amplitude (0.8 m) visual scene translation and two conditions of each vibration on and vibration off. The leg segment gain to each modality was compared between groups and across conditions using a repeated-measures ANOVA.Results There were no changes in leg segment gain to vision (i.e. group effect; F = 2.624, p = 0.094, η2 = 0.086), gain to GVS (F = 1.341, p = 0.266, η2 = 0.46), or gain to vibration (F = 3.124, p = 0.088, η2 = 0.100). In addition, there were no changes in sensory reweighting for any modality (i.e. condition X group effect; vision, F = 0.074, p = 0.788, η2 = 0.003; GVS, F = 0.547, p = 0.46, η2 = 0.019; vibration, F = 0.734, p = 0.399, η2 = 0.026).Conclusions Our findings suggest that there are no differences in sensory reweighting between collegiate collision and non-contact sport athletes. Despite concerns that RHI exposure through routine collision sport participation may result in balance disturbances, our results do not support this association.

map