@article {DattaS33作者= {Shaetu达塔和詹姆斯Clugston罗素·鲍尔和扎克Houck迈克尔·贾菲和莫雷诺查尔斯},title ={脑震荡概要文件之间的关联和神经认知功能},体积={93},数量={14补充1},页面= {S33——S33} = {2019}, doi = {10.1212/01. wnl.0000581148.80387.31},出版商= {Wolters Kluwer健康,公司代表美国神经病学学会},文摘={客观检查脑震荡的概要文件和神经认知功能之间的关系,以中枢神经系统体征(CNSVS)。首页背景后临床表现的异质性冲击治疗临床医生提出了挑战。Kontos和柯林斯提出一个模型的初始全球轨迹描绘成特定的临床症状,称为脑震荡的概要文件。设计/方法研究是回顾性的,盲目复习脑震荡患者数据的专业诊所。临床医生决定如果病人满足标准剖面,并确定主要的配置文件。单向方差分析{\ textquoteright}年代被用来确定脑震荡的整体效果在CNSVS multi-test域。ω的平方(ω2)被用来估计的总体效果大小:0.01(小),0.06(媒介)、0.14(大)。对冲{\ textquoteright} s g使用事后确定效应的大小意味着在每个域配置文件之间的差异:0.2(小),0.5(媒介)、0.8(大)。从佛罗里达大学获得结果数据由88名参与者脑震荡和体育项目(中位年龄= 26.5;差,18.0 {\ textendash} 51.8;90 \ %白种人;38岁的平均天伤害= 71,差{\ textendash} 155)。头痛或偏头痛是最常见的主要配置文件(23 \ %),而认知最流行(8 \ %)。 The cognitive profile was associated with worse scores on the neurocognitive index (ω2 = 0.008; g = 0.71{\textendash}1.04), reaction time (ω2 = 0.081; g = 0.60{\textendash}1.21), memory (ω2 = 0.016; g = 0.50{\textendash}0.96), psychomotor speed (ω2 = 0.023; g = 0.34{\textendash}0.62), complex attention (ω2 = 0.026; g = 0.30{\textendash}0.72), and cognitive flexibility (ω2 = 0.029; g = 0.36{\textendash}0.65) domains relative to other profiles. The vestibular (g = 0.39{\textendash}0.83) and anxiety/mood profiles (g = 0.33{\textendash}0.76) were associated with worse reaction time relative to all other profiles except cognitive. Lastly, the headache/migraine profile was associated with worse complex attention (g = 0.26{\textendash}0.53) and cognitive flexibility (g = 0.29{\textendash}0.65) relative to other profiles except cognitive.Conclusions The cognitive profile is characterized by global cognitive deficits, while deficits in other profiles are domain-specific. Clinicians should consider the role of non-cognitive profiles when interpreting neurocognitive scores.}, issn = {0028-3878}, URL = {//www.ez-admanager.com/content/93/14_Supplement_1/S33.1}, eprint = {//www.ez-admanager.com/content/93/14_Supplement_1/S33.1.full.pdf}, journal = {Neurology} }