Accuracy of CT Perfusion–Based Core Estimation of Follow-up Infarction
Effects of Time Since Last Known Well
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives To assess the accuracy of baseline CT perfusion (CTP) ischemic core estimates.
Methods From SELECT (Optimizing Patient Selection for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke), a prospective multicenter cohort study of imaging selection, patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy who achieved complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Ischemia score 3) and had follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) available were evaluated. Follow-up DWI lesions were coregistered to baseline CTP. The difference between baseline CTP core (relative cerebral blood flow [rCBF] <30%) volume and follow-up infarct volume was classified as overestimation (core ≥10 mL larger than infarct), adequate, or underestimation (core ≥25 mL smaller than infarct) and spatial overlap was evaluated.
Results Of 101 included patients, median time from last known well (LKW) to imaging acquisition was 138 (82–244) minutes. The median baseline ischemic core estimate was 9 (0–31.9) mL and median follow-up infarct volume was 18.4 (5.3–68.7) mL. All 6/101 (6%) patients with overestimation of the subsequent infarct volume were imaged within 90 minutes of LKW and achieved rapid reperfusion (within 120 minutes of CTP). Using rCBF <20% threshold to estimate ischemic core in patients presenting within 90 minutes eliminated overestimation. Volumetric correlation between the ischemic core estimate and follow-up imaging improved as LKW time to imaging acquisition increased: Spearman ρ <90 minutes 0.33 (p = 0.049), 90–270 minutes 0.63 (p < 0.0001), >270 minutes 0.86 (p < 0.0001). Assessment of the spatial overlap between baseline CTP ischemic core lesion and follow-up infarct demonstrated that a median of 3.2 (0.0–9.0) mL of estimated core fell outside the subsequent infarct. These regions were predominantly in white matter.
Discussion Significant overestimation of irreversibly injured ischemic core volume was rare, was only observed in patients who presented within 90 minutes of LKW and achieved reperfusion within 120 minutes of CTP acquisition, and occurred primarily in white matter. Use of a more conservative (rCBF <20%) threshold for estimating ischemic core in patients presenting within 90 minutes eliminated all significant overestimation cases.
Trial Registration Information ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03876457.
Glossary
- ASPECTS=
- Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score;
- CTP=
- CT perfusion;
- DWI=
- diffusion-weighted imaging;
- EVT=
- endovascular thrombectomy;
- IQR=
- interquartile range;
- LKW=
- last known well;
- MR-DWI=
- magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging;
- mTICI=
- modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Ischemia;
- NCCT=
- noncontrast CT;
- rCBF=
- relative cerebral blood flow;
- RCT=
- randomized clinical trial;
- ROI=
- region of interest;
- SELECT=
- Optimizing Patient Selection for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke;
- SWIFT-PRIME=
- Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
SELECT coinvestigators are listed at links.lww.com/WNL/B927
Editorial, page 867
Infographic: NPub.org/ig9821
- Received October 4, 2021.
- Accepted in final form February 8, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Author Response: Accuracy of CT Perfusion-Based Core Estimation of Follow-Up Infarction: Effects of Time-Since-Last-Known-Well
- Amrou Sarraj, Professor of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Neurological Institute, Cleveland OH
- Bruce C.V. Campbell, Head of Neurology and Stroke, Department of Neurology & Melbourne Brain Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville VIC Australia.
- Deep Pujara, Research Associate, University Hospitals Neurological Institute
- Gregory W. Albers, Professor of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine
Submitted May 04, 2022 - Reader Response: Accuracy of CT Perfusion-Based Core Estimation of Follow-Up Infarction: Effects of Time-Since-Last-Known-Well
- Alvaro Garcia-Tornel Garcia-Camba, Stroke Neurologist, Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron
- Marc Ribo Jacobi, Stroke Neurologist, Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron
Submitted April 28, 2022
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.