Prognostic indicators of improvement with therapeutic plasma exchange in pediatric demyelination
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objectives To determine the safety and clinical benefit of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) as rescue therapy in children with acute inflammatory demyelinating CNS syndromes and to identify baseline prognostic indicators of treatment improvement.
Methods This single-center retrospective pediatric cohort included all consecutive patients admitted to our hospital over the period from 2003 to 2017 because of a steroid-refractory acute CNS event presumed to be inflammatory who required TPE. Functional status assessment to identify improvement included the following performance category scales: visual outcome, bladder control, gait, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). These assessments were performed before and after TPE in every patient.
Results Sixty-five children requiring TPE to treat 78 CNS attacks were included for analysis. Median age at TPE was 10.5 years (1.9–18 years); 45% were girls. Seropositivity (aquaporin-4 water channel–immunoglobulin G [IgG] or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein–IgG) was found in 20 of 42 (48%) patients. Attack phenotypes leading to TPE were optic neuritis (ON) in 42%, longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) in 31%, ON + LETM in 15%, and other combined syndromes in 11%. Overall, moderate to marked neurologic improvement was observed in 72% of children at the end of TPE and in 88.5% at 6 months of follow-up. Lower baseline scores on the EDSS, visual outcome, and gait scales were found to be independent prognostic indicators of treatment benefit. Sex, age at onset and at TPE, attack phenotype, disease duration, and time from attack onset to TPE initiation were not significantly associated with treatment outcome. Adverse events were observed in 31 of 524 (5.9%) procedures, being severe in 4.
Conclusions TPE was an effective rescue therapy associated with functional improvement. No therapeutic window for TPE initiation was identified in this pediatric cohort. Overall frequency of adverse events was low; however, serious events should be anticipated and avoided.
Classification of evidence This study provides Class IV evidence that for children with acute inflammatory demyelinating CNS syndromes, TPE leads to functional improvement.
Glossary
- ADEM=
- acute disseminated encephalomyelitis;
- AQP4=
- aquaporin-4 water channel;
- BCS=
- bladder control scale;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- CVC=
- central vein catheter;
- EDSS=
- Expanded Disability Status Scale;
- GS=
- gait scale;
- HDIC=
- high-dose IV corticosteroids;
- IgG=
- immunoglobulin G;
- LETM=
- longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis;
- MOG=
- myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein;
- MS=
- multiple sclerosis;
- NMOSD=
- neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder;
- ON=
- optic neuritis;
- OR=
- odds ratio;
- TPE=
- therapeutic plasma exchange;
- VOS=
- visual outcome scale
Footnotes
Presented in part as a poster at the 34th Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, October 10 to 12, 2018, Berlin, Germany; and the International Child Neurology Congress, November 15 to 18, 2018, Mumbai, India.
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Editorial, page 953
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
Podcast: NPub.org/ujyrl1
CME Course: NPub.org/cmelist
- Received March 11, 2019.
- Accepted in final form July 19, 2019.
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
More Online
Dr. Farwa Ali and Dr. Lauren Jackson
► Watch
Related Articles
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
Antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in bilateral and recurrent optic neuritisSudarshini Ramanathan, Stephen W. Reddel, Andrew Henderson et al.Neurology - Neuroimmunology Neuroinflammation, October 29, 2014 -
Article
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disordersComparison according to the phenotype and serostatusMaria Sepúlveda, Thaís Armangué, Nuria Sola-Valls et al.Neurology - Neuroimmunology Neuroinflammation, April 14, 2016 -
Article
Disability Outcomes in the N-MOmentum Trial of Inebilizumab in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum DisorderRomain Marignier, Jeffrey L. Bennett, Ho Jin Kim et al.Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, March 26, 2021 -
Articles
A population-based study of neuromyelitis optica in CaucasiansN. Asgari, S.T. Lillevang, H.P.B. Skejoe et al.Neurology, May 02, 2011