Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion scoring using double inversion recovery MRI
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: Different double inversion recovery (DIR) sequences are currently used in multiple sclerosis (MS) research centers to visualize cortical lesions, making it difficult to compare published data. This study aimed to formulate consensus recommendations for scoring cortical lesions in patients with MS, using DIR images acquired in 6 European centers according to local protocols.
Methods: Consensus recommendations were formulated and tested in a multinational meeting.
Results: Cortical lesions were defined as focal abnormalities on DIR, hyperintense compared to adjacent normal-appearing gray matter, and were not scored unless ≥3 pixels in size, based on at least 1.0 mm2 in-plane resolution. Besides these 2 obligatory criteria, additional, supportive recommendations concerned a priori artifact definition on DIR, use of additional MRI contrasts to verify suspected lesions, and a constant level of displayed image contrast. Robustness of the recommendations was tested in a small dataset of available, heterogeneous DIR images, provided by the different participating centers. An overall moderate agreement was reached when using the proposed recommendations: more than half of the readers agreed on slightly more than half (54%) of the cortical lesions scored, whereas complete agreement was reached in 19.4% of the lesions (usually larger, mixed white matter/gray matter lesions).
Conclusions: Although not designed as a formal interobserver study, the current study suggests that comparing available literature data on cortical lesions may be problematic, and increased consistency in acquisition protocols may improve scoring agreement. Sensitivity and specificity of the proposed recommendations should now be studied in a more formal, prospective, multicenter setting using similar DIR protocols.
Footnotes
-
Study funding: The MS Center Amsterdam is supported by the Dutch MS Research Foundation (05-358c). The NMR Research Unit of the Department of Neuroinflammation is supported by the MS Society Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and Department of Health's NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH.
-
- DIR
- double inversion recovery
- EDSS
- Expanded Disability Status Scale
- GM
- gray matter
- MS
- multiple sclerosis
- WM
- white matter.
-
Editorial, page 412
- Received May 18, 2010.
- Accepted August 30, 2010.
- Copyright © 2011 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Dennis Bourdette and Dr. Lindsey Wooliscroft
► Watch
Related Articles
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
Postmortem verification of MS cortical lesion detection with 3D DIRA. Seewann, E.-J. Kooi, S.D. Roosendaal et al.Neurology, January 04, 2012 -
Articles
Distinct lesion morphology at 7-T MRI differentiates neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosisTim Sinnecker, Jan Dörr, Caspar F. Pfueller et al.Neurology, August 01, 2012 -
Editorials
MS cortical lesions on double inversion recovery MRIFew but trueOlga Ciccarelli, Jacqueline T. Chen et al.Neurology, January 04, 2012 -
Editorials
MS cortical lesion or not?Double inversion recovery MRI reveals some answers and uncertaintiesJacqueline T. Chen, Istvan Pirko et al.Neurology, January 05, 2011