The neurologist and the dying patient
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
In this issue and in the April 1996 issue of Neurology, two position papers from the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Ethics and Humanities Subcommittee highlight the ethical responsibilities of neurologists to their chronically ill and dying patients. [1,2] These papers supplement three previous position papers published over the past 7 years by the AAN Ethics and Humanities Subcommittee. [3-5] Together they constitute a set of ethical guidelines for neurologists in the management of their chronically ill, critically ill, and dying patients. On the basis of the AAN position papers and learned opinion in medical ethics, here we present current recommendations for ethical practices by neurologists in treating patients at the end of their lives.
Patients have the right to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
One of the dominant themes of late 20th century medical ethics and medical jurisprudence is that patients have the ethical and legal right to refuse lifesustaining therapy even if they will die as a result of that treatment refusal. This right is grounded in ethical concepts of respect for personal autonomy and in legal concepts of self-determination. Respect for autonomy and selfdetermination form the foundation for the doctrine of informed consent. Except in emergencies, neurologists should not order tests or prescribe therapies without first obtaining patients' free and informed consent. Patients retain the ultimate right to consent to or to refuse the neurologist's suggested tests or therapies. [6]
When patients lose the capacity to make treatment decisions, their right to provide consent and refusal is transferred to a surrogate decision-maker. The surrogate decision-maker should attempt to reproduce the decision the patient would have made in that situation, thereby respecting the patient's autonomy and self-determination. In the absence of information about what decision the patient would have made, the surrogate …
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
- Article
- Patients have the right to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
- Neurologists have a duty to provide adequate palliative care.
- Neurologists do not have a duty to provide assisted suicide or active euthanasia.
- Neurologists should encourage improved physician education on palliative care.
- Acknowledgment
- REFERENCES
- Info & Disclosures
Dr. Dennis Bourdette and Dr. Lindsey Wooliscroft
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Special Editorial
End of lifeExpert care and support, not physician‐hastened deathJoseph C. Masdeu, Allen J. Aksamit, Alan C. Carver et al.Neurology, September 17, 2019 -
Articles
End-of-life careA survey of US neurologists’ attitudes, behavior, and knowledgeA.C. Carver, B.G. Vickrey, J.L. Bernat et al.Neurology, July 01, 1999 -
Position Statement
Assisted suicide, euthanasia, and the neurologistThe Ethics and Humanities Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology* et al.Neurology, March 01, 1998 -
AAN Special Article
Ethical Considerations in Dementia Diagnosis and CareAAN Position StatementWinston Chiong, Amy Y. Tsou, Zachary Simmons et al.Neurology, July 12, 2021