基于仿真的开发和评价lgorithm to Optimize the Planning of Interim Analyses for Clinical Trials in ALS
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
Abstract
Objective:Late-phase clinical trials for neurodegenerative diseases have a low probability of success. Here we introduce an algorithm that optimizes the planning of interim analyses for clinical trials in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) to better use the time and resources available, and minimize the exposure of patients to ineffective or harmful drugs.
Methods:A simulation-based algorithm was developed to determine the optimal interim analysis scheme by integrating prior knowledge about the success rate of ALS clinical trials with drug-specific information obtained in early phase studies. Interim analysis schemes were optimized by varying the number and timing of interim analyses, together with their decision rules about when to stop a trial. The algorithm was applied retrospectively to three clinical trials that investigated the efficacy of diaphragm pacing or ceftriaxone on survival in patients with ALS. Outcomes were additionally compared to conventional interim designs.
Results:We evaluated 183 to 1351 unique interim analysis schemes for each trial. Application of the optimal designs correctly established lack of efficacy, would have concluded all studies 1.2 to 19.4 months earlier (reduction of 4.6 to 57.7% in trial duration) and could have reduced the number of randomized patients by 1.7 to 58.1%. By means of simulation, we illustrate the efficiency for other treatment scenarios. The optimized interim analysis schemes outperformed conventional interim designs in most scenarios.
Conclusions:Our algorithm uses prior knowledge to determine the uncertainty of the expected treatment effect in ALS clinical trials and optimizes the planning of interim analyses. Improving futility monitoring in ALS could minimize the exposure of patients to ineffective or harmful treatments, and result in significant ethical and efficiency gains.
- ReceivedNovember 18, 2022.
- Accepted in final formMarch 3, 2023.
- Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months:http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completedPublishing Agreement Formto首页Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Gil I. Wolfe and Dr. Nicholas Silvestri
► Watch
Related Articles
-
No related articles found.