Drs。雷迪和Verheijde几个重要的评论。他们担心无响应时间合理提高临床评估。这就是为什么脑死亡的决心不能接近的配方是没有深入理解脑死亡的决心。河畔的证据支持的指导方针是弱,在这个问题的背景下,他们是最清醒,深思熟虑的主题指导方针。疲软的证据级别不应该导致放弃现有的指导方针的重要性。相反,他们应该帮助激励那些有兴趣推进。扩大科学探究在关键领域可用的证据可以支持水平有一天被应用到未来的迭代的指导方针。他们提出的第三个问题是关于“团队聚在一起”的潜力,但优雅的影响(包括医疗团队和详细的)在临终决定和BDD。这是provokative发表评论,强调发展的重要性深对解耦的概念(从请求OD分离BDD)在我们的临床实践和与家人的沟通/决策者。 Articulating ethical boundaries to preserve integrity of the process and patient-centered decisions through the end of our patient's life is an important step in evolving in this area of clinical practice. Until now, OPO's have taken on the task of educating physicians about BDD better than the neurological community. They have served a vital role in helping limit the impact of widespread variability in physician confidence and experience with BDD. This experience has often sabotaged family confidence with end of life care and must be changed. As we take better ownership of BDD and help evolve practice - the trustworthiness of the process can be preserved. Much progress has been made to deserve public trust with BDD, and our study simply emphasizes that we cannot be complacent with where we are. We have more work to be done.
Drs。雷迪和Verheijde几个重要的评论。他们担心无响应时间合理提高临床评估。这就是为什么脑死亡的决心不能接近的配方是没有深入理解脑死亡的决心。河畔的证据支持的指导方针是弱,在这个问题的背景下,他们是最清醒,深思熟虑的主题指导方针。疲软的证据级别不应该导致放弃现有的指导方针的重要性。相反,他们应该帮助激励那些有兴趣推进。扩大科学探究在关键领域可用的证据可以支持水平有一天被应用到未来的迭代的指导方针。他们提出的第三个问题是关于“团队聚在一起”的潜力,但优雅的影响(包括医疗团队和详细的)在临终决定和BDD。这是provokative发表评论,强调发展的重要性深对解耦的概念(从请求OD分离BDD)在我们的临床实践和与家人的沟通/决策者。 Articulating ethical boundaries to preserve integrity of the process and patient-centered decisions through the end of our patient's life is an important step in evolving in this area of clinical practice. Until now, OPO's have taken on the task of educating physicians about BDD better than the neurological community. They have served a vital role in helping limit the impact of widespread variability in physician confidence and experience with BDD. This experience has often sabotaged family confidence with end of life care and must be changed. As we take better ownership of BDD and help evolve practice - the trustworthiness of the process can be preserved. Much progress has been made to deserve public trust with BDD, and our study simply emphasizes that we cannot be complacent with where we are. We have more work to be done.