This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies provide direct evidence of the important role of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) during walking in aging and Parkinson disease (PD). Most studies explored mean hemoglobin (HbO2) levels, while moment-to-moment variability measures have rarely been investigated. Variability measures can inform on flexibility, which is imperative for adaptive function. We hypothesized that patients with PD will show less variability in HbO2 signals during walking compared to healthy controls.
Methods Two hundred six participants, 57 healthy controls (age 68.9 ± 1.0 years, 27 women) and 149 patients with idiopathic PD (age 69.8 ± 0.6 years, 50 women, disease duration 8.27 ± 5.51 years), performed usual walking and dual-task walking (serial 3 subtractions) with an fNIRS sensor placed on the forehead. HbO2 variability was calculated from the SD, range, and mean detrended time series of fNIRS-derived HbO2 signal evaluated during each walking task. HbO2 variability was compared between groups and between walking tasks with mixed model analyses.
Results Higher variability (SD, range, mean detrended time series) was observed during dual-task walking compared to usual walking (p < 0.025), but this was derived from the differences within the healthy control group (group × task interaction p < 0.007). On the other hand, task repetition demonstrated reduced variability in healthy controls but increased variability in patients with PD (interaction group × walk repetition p < 0.048). The Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score correlated with HbO2 range (r = 0.142, p = 0.050) and HbO2 SD (r = 0.173, p = 0.018) during usual walking among all participants.
Discussion In this study, we suggest a new way to interpret changes in HbO2 variability. We relate increased HbO2 variability to flexible adaptation to environmental challenges and decreased HbO2 variability to the stability of performance. Our results show that both are limited in PD; however, further investigation of these concepts is required. Moreover, HbO2 variability measures are an important aspect of brain function that add new insights into the role of PFC during walking with aging and PD.
Trial Registration Information ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01732653.
Classification of Evidence This study provides Class III evidence that patients with PD have more variability within HbO2 signals during usual walking compared to healthy controls but not during dual-task walking.
Glossary
- BOLD=
- blood oxygenation level–dependent;
- DSM-IV=
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition;
- fNIRS=
- near-infrared spectroscopy;
- HbO2=
- hemoglobin;
- MDS=
- Movement Disorder Society;
- MoCA=
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment;
- PD=
- Parkinson disease;
- PFC=
- prefrontal cortex;
- UPDRS=
- Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
- Received June 23, 2021.
- Accepted in final form November 24, 2021.
- © 2021 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
