This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Children and adolescents with chronic migraine who have continuous headache may have high levels of headache-related disability but have largely been excluded from clinical trials. Understanding patient-valued treatment outcomes may facilitate future study design. The aim of this work was to identify patient-valued outcome measures for headache preventive treatments among adolescents with continuous headache due to chronic migraine and their parents.
Methods Adolescents with an International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition diagnosis of chronic migraine, who had continuous headache and who were being cared for at a tertiary pediatric headache clinic, and their parents were surveyed to query the value of treatment outcomes in the domains of headache frequency, intensity, functional impact, and associated symptoms. Individual outcomes and categories of outcomes were ranked in order of preference using weighted average rank. Results were rounded to the degree of precision with which they were measured.
Results The survey was completed by 55 adolescents and 60 parents of adolescents with continuous headache due to chronic migraine. Mean age of adolescents was 16 (SD 1, range 12–17) years. Median adolescent-reported duration of continuous headache was 24 (interquartile range [IQR] 12–39) months, and adolescents had tried a median of 2 (IQR 0–5) preventive medications, only 13% of which were perceived as helpful. Overall, the most valued individual outcome measure among both adolescents and parents was a decrease in frequency of more severe headaches; however, outcomes reflecting headache intensity were most valued by adolescents, while outcomes reflecting functional impact were most valued by parents. More than 60% of adolescents felt that it was more important to measure decrease in frequency and intensity of headaches in terms of severe headaches/spikes rather than total headache days. Among associated symptoms, improvement in brain fog was most highly valued by both adolescents and parents.
Discussion The results of this study provide important information about which preventive treatment outcomes are valued by adolescents with continuous headache due to chronic migraine and their parents. Results suggest that adolescents value a decrease in frequency of severe headaches over a decrease in frequency of headache days overall. Generalizability may be limited because the surveyed population was being cared for at a tertiary pediatric headache clinic and generally had headache disorders that were refractory to treatment. These results may help guide future trial design in this population with continuous headache due to chronic migraine.
Glossary
- ICD-10=
- International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision;
- ICHD-3=
- International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition;
- IQR=
- interquartile range;
- PedMIDAS=
- Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment;
- UCSF=
- University of California, San Francisco
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Renee Shellhaas, MD, MS.
CME Course: NPub.org/cmelist
- Received August 26, 2021.
- Accepted in final form February 10, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
More Online
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg