The Effect of a Home Exercise Program on Visio-Vestibular Function in Concussed Pediatric Patients
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
Abstract
Objective To explore if a home exercise program (HEP) affects visio-vestibular function in concussed pediatric patients.
Background A HEP can provide an equitable and cost-effective method for therapy targeted towards visio-vestibular deficits that are common following concussion. It is unclear if pediatric patients prescribed a HEP demonstrate improved visio-vestibular function.
Design/Methods This observational study included 1,041 patients (59% female; age = 14.0 ± 2.5 years) reporting to a specialty care concussion center for an initial visit ≤28 days post-injury and follow-up ≤60 days post-injury. All patients completed a Visio-Vestibular Examination (VVE) at both timepoints consisting of 9 subtests: smooth pursuit, horizontal/vertical saccades and gaze stability, binocular convergence, left/right monocular accommodation, and complex tandem gait. Patients were prescribed a HEP (1–2 times/day) at initial visit consisting of exercises addressing visio-vestibular deficits. At follow-up, patients reported their progress: (1) has not done the HEP, (2) is currently doing the HEP, or (3) has completed the HEP. Primary outcomes included HEP progress, VVE subtests (normal/abnormal), and total VVE (abnormal = 2 + abnormal subtests). Chi-square tests with Bonferroni corrections were used to determine if abnormal VVE outcomes were associated with HEP status.
Results At initial visit, 81 2(77.6%) patients presented with abnormal total VVE. At follow-up, the proportion of abnormal total VVE did not differ among patients not doing the HEP (101 [62.0%]), patients currently doing the HEP (516 [69.0%]), and patients who had completed the HEP (51 [69.0%]). However among VVE subtests, a lower proportion who completed the HEP presented with abnormal smooth pursuit (7.5%), horizontal (3.8%) and vertical (3.8%) saccades, and complex tandem gait (0%) relative to patients currently doing the HEP (p = 0.003) and patients not doing the HEP (p = 0.01).
Conclusions Our findings indicate that patients who completed the HEP presented with improved elements of visio-vestibular function relative to those who did not start or were currently doing the HEP.
Footnotes
Disclosure: The institution of Patricia Roby has received research support from NIH. Eileen Storey has nothing to disclose. The institution of Dr. Master has received research support from NIH. The institution of Dr. Master has received research support from DoD. The institution of Dr. Master has received research support from AMSSM. The institution of Dr. Master has received research support from PA Department of Health. The institution of Kristy Arbogast has received research support from NIH. The institution of Kristy Arbogast has received research support from Pennsylvania Department of Health. The institution of Kristy Arbogast has received research support from Football Research Inc.
- © 2021 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Differences in Age-related Retinal and Cortical Atrophy Rates in Multiple Sclerosis
Prof. Massimo Filippi and Dr. Paolo Preziosa
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.