This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives To determine the significance of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in childhood stroke, we compared PFO prevalence, PFO features, and stroke recurrence risk in 25 children with cryptogenic arterial ischemic stroke (AIS), 54 children with AIS from a known etiology, and 209 healthy controls.
Methods We performed a case-control analysis of a 14-year prospectively enrolled single-center cohort of children with AIS who underwent transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and compared them to TTEs of otherwise healthy children evaluated for benign cardiac concerns. Stroke patients 29 days to 18 years of age at stroke ictus with confirmed acute AIS on imaging, availability of complete diagnostic studies of stroke risk factors, including TTE images available for central review, and at least 1 follow-up evaluation after index stroke were included. Presence of PFO and high-risk PFO features were assessed by 2 independent, blinded reviewers and compared between groups with the Fisher exact test. Stroke/TIA recurrence risk was determined from Cox proportional hazards models.
Results Of 154 children with first-ever AIS, 79 were eligible; 25 had cryptogenic AIS, and 54 had a known cause. PFO prevalence was higher in the cryptogenic group (7, 28%) compared to both the known stroke etiology group (3, 5.6%, p = 0.009) and controls without stroke (24, 11.5%, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in presence of right-to-left shunt and atrial septal aneurysm. Median follow-up time for entire stroke cohort was 20.9 months. Stroke-free recurrence at 2-years did not differ between children with and without PFO (HR 2.0, 95% CI 0.4–9.3, p = 0.39).
Discussion PFO prevalence was higher in children with cryptogenic stroke compared to patients with AIS with known etiology and healthy controls. PFO was not associated with increased recurrence risk. Optimal secondary preventive treatment in children with cryptogenic stroke and PFO remains uncertain and requires further study.
Classification of Evidence This study provides Class III evidence that children with cryptogenic ischemic stroke have an increased frequency of PFO compared to children with ischemic stroke of known etiology and healthy controls.
Glossary
- AIS=
- arterial ischemic stroke;
- ASA=
- atrial septal aneurysm;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- IQR=
- interquartile range;
- PFO=
- patent foramen ovale;
- RTL=
- right-to-left;
- TTE=
- transthoracic echocardiography
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
↵* These authors contributed equally to this work as senior authors.
Editorial, page 973
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
CME Course: NPub.org/cmelist
- Received February 3, 2021.
- Accepted in final form August 30, 2021.
- © 2021 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Reader Response: Prevalence of Patent Foramen Ovale in a Cohort of Children With Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke
- Reader Response: Prevalence of Patent Foramen Ovale in a Cohort of Children With Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
