Assay sensitivity and study features in neuropathic pain trials
An ACTTION meta-analysis
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: Our objective was to identify patient, study, and site factors associated with assay sensitivity in placebo-controlled neuropathic pain trials.
Methods: We examined the associations between study characteristics and standardized effect size (SES) in a database of 200 publicly available randomized clinical trials of pharmacologic treatments for neuropathic pain.
Results: There was considerable heterogeneity in the SESs among the examined trials. Univariate meta-regression analyses indicated that larger SESs were significantly associated with trials that had 1) greater minimum baseline pain inclusion criteria, 2) greater mean subject age, 3) a larger percentage of Caucasian subjects, and 4) a smaller total number of subjects. In a multiple meta-regression analysis, the associations between SES and minimum baseline pain inclusion criterion and age remained significant.
Conclusions: Our analyses have examined potentially modifiable correlates of study SES and shown that a minimum pain inclusion criterion of 40 or above on a 0 to 100 scale is associated with a larger SES. These data provide a foundation for investigating strategies to improve assay sensitivity and thereby decrease the likelihood of falsely negative outcomes in clinical trials of efficacious treatments for neuropathic pain.
GLOSSARY
- ACTTION=
- Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- DPN=
- diabetic peripheral neuropathy;
- FDA=
- US Food and Drug Administration;
- NRS=
- numerical rating scale;
- PHN=
- postherpetic neuralgia;
- PRISMA=
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses;
- RCT=
- randomized clinical trial;
- SES=
- standardized effect size;
- VAS=
- visual analog scale
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Supplemental data at www.neurology.org
- Received October 3, 2012.
- Accepted in final form March 13, 2013.
- © 2013 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Efficacy of Ubrogepant in the Acute Treatment of Migraine With Mild Pain vs Moderate or Severe Pain
Dr. Kathleen Digre and Dr. Kendra Pham
► Watch
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
Clinical trial outcome in neuropathic painRelationship to study characteristicsJennifer Katz, Nanna B. Finnerup, Robert H. Dworkin et al.Neurology, January 21, 2008 -
Articles
Methodological issues in clinical trials of opioids for chronic painNathaniel Katz et al.Neurology, December 29, 2005 -
Views & Reviews
The impact of neuropathic pain on health-related quality of lifeReview and implicationsMark P. Jensen, Marci J. Chodroff, Robert H. Dworkin et al.Neurology, April 09, 2007 -
Article
A randomized trial of pregabalin in patients with neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injuryDiana D. Cardenas, Edward C. Nieshoff, Kota Suda et al.Neurology, January 23, 2013