This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
During the last 20 years, an enormous research effort and hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent attempting to develop and prove that drugs may slow the rate of progression of Parkinson disease (PD). At the time of writing, no drug has yet satisfied the rigorous criteria set by clinicians and licensing authorities for a neuroprotective agent. Despite this apparent failure, numerous important lessons have been learned, and some areas for optimism have emerged. Dopaminergic drugs have, for 40 years, been the basis for the treatment of the predominant early motor features of PD. Several of these drugs have also demonstrated an ability to protect cells, including neurons, against a range of toxins that are of relevance to the pathogenesis of PD. Some have entered clinical trials for neuroprotection, and a few have produced a positive result according to the endpoint selected. The interpretation of these trials is the subject of some debate. A pattern has emerged in these and other clinical trials, which has lead to a novel concept for neuroprotection, and that is simply to treat early rather than delay. The basis for this may lie in the support of basal ganglia compensatory mechanisms and the restoration of normal dopaminergic transmission.
Footnotes
-
Disclosure: The author has served as a consultant to Teva and spoken at symposia sponsored by them.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
