Deficient sequencing of pantomimes in apraxia
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: Typically, the apraxic deficit of patients with left hemisphere damage is more pronounced for complex, i.e., sequential actions, than for simple ones. This impaired action sequencing can be attributed to a faulty selection of movements, a deficit of shifting motor attention, or, alternatively, disturbed processing of action-related temporal information.
Methods: Twenty patients with lesions of the left hemisphere with and without apraxia and 20 patients with right hemisphere lesions with and without neglect were asked to detect errors in the sequential structure or the spatial configuration of object-related complex actions, visually presented as actions with objects or pantomimes.
Results: As expected, both patients with apraxia and neglect performed worse than patients without neuropsychological deficit (or elderly control subjects, n = 10). Side of lesion per se did not influence error rate. In contrast, left hemisphere-damaged patients with apraxia showed a specific deficit in detecting errors in the sequential structure of complex pantomime actions. In accordance with functional imaging studies showing an involvement of the left parietal cortex in movement-related temporal processing, lesion analysis of the patients with left hemisphere lesions revealed that damage to the inferior parietal cortex (angular gyrus) was associated with this specific impairment in detecting sequential errors in pantomime action.
Conclusions: The data suggest that impaired processing of temporal movement information due to lesions of the left inferior parietal cortex contributes to the complex action sequencing deficit in apraxia.
GLOSSARY: FAST = Florida Apraxia Screening Test; LH = left hemisphere; LHpat = patients with left hemisphere lesions; NET = Neglect Test; OSe = detection of sequential errors in actions with objects; OSp = detection of spatial errors in actions with objects; PSe = detection of sequential errors in pantomimed actions; PSp = detection of spatial errors in pantomimed actions; RH = right hemisphere; RHpat = patients with right hemisphere lesions; TAP = Test Battery of Attentional Performance.
Footnotes
-
G.R.F. is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG KFO 112, TP1). P.H.W. is supported by the START program (AZ 35/04) of the Medical Faculty of the RWTH Aachen.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Received January 3, 2007. Accepted in final form July 23, 2007.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Babak Hooshmand and Dr. David Smith
► Watch
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
Hemispheric asymmetries of limb-kinetic apraxiaA loss of deftnessKenneth M. Heilman, Kimford J. Meador, David W. Loring et al.Neurology, August 22, 2000 -
Articles
Conceptual apraxia from lateralized lesionsKenneth M. Heilman, Lynn M. Maher, Margaret L. Greenwald et al.Neurology, August 01, 1997 -
Articles
Cerebral lateralizationRelationship of language and ideomotor praxisK.J. Meador, D.W. Loring, K. Lee et al.Neurology, December 01, 1999 -
Brief Communications
Perception of motor strength and stimulus magnitude are correlated in stroke patientsP. A. Taylor-Cooke, R. Ricci, J. H. Baños et al.Neurology, May 08, 2006