This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the concordance of a volumetric method for measuring white matter lesion (WML) change with visual rating scales.
Methods: The authors selected a stratified sample of 20 elderly people (mean age 72 years, range 61 to 88 years) with an MRI examination at baseline and at 3-year follow-up from the community-based Rotterdam Scan Study (RSS). Four raters assessed WML change with four different visual rating scales: the Fazekas scale, the Scheltens scale, the RSS scale, and a new visual rating scale that was designed to measure change in WML. The authors assessed concordance with a volumetric method with scatter plots and correlations, and interobserver agreement with intraclass correlation coefficients.
Results: For assessment of change in WML, the Fazekas, Scheltens, and periventricular part of the RSS scale showed little correlation with volumetrics, and low interobserver agreement. The authors’ new WML change scale and the subcortical part of the RSS scale showed good correlation with volumetrics. After additional training, the new WML change scale showed good interobserver agreement for measuring WML change.
Conclusions: Commonly used visual rating scales are not well suited for measuring change in white matter lesion severity. The authors’ new white matter lesion change scale is more accurate and precise, and may be of use in studies focusing on progression of white matter lesions.
- Received May 27, 2003.
- Accepted in final form December 1, 2003.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
