Quality of life as a predictor for change in disability in MS
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the predictive value of quality of life on changes in disability measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).
Background: There are few good prognostic factors for disease development in MS. Quality of life and self-rated health have been shown to be highly predictive of morbidity and disease development in heart disease and cancer.
Methods: Data on quality of life (SF-36 Health Survey) were ascertained at baseline for 97 relapsing-remitting patients with MS participating in a short-term clinical trial on interferon α-2a. These scores were correlated with change in EDSS scores 1 year later, 6 months after treatment ended.
Results: Low scores on the SF-36 mental health scale were correlated with increased (worsened) EDSS scores 1 year later (r = −0.29, p = 0.006). The results were not altered by adjusting for disease activity at baseline, which was measured by the number gadolinium-enhanced MRI lesions, relapse rate for the preceding 2 years, and baseline EDSS score. Similar results were found for self-rated health (according to the first question of the SF-36).
Conclusions: These findings reinforce the importance of incorporating the patients’ evaluation of their quality of life during treatment. Further, assessing such measures is important in evaluating effects in treatment trials in MS.
- Received December 29, 1999.
- Accepted in final form April 6, 2000.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Efficacy of Ubrogepant in the Acute Treatment of Migraine With Mild Pain vs Moderate or Severe Pain
Dr. Kathleen Digre and Dr. Kendra Pham
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
Responsiveness and predictive value of EDSS and MSFC in primary progressive MSJ. J. Kragt, A. J. Thompson, X. Montalban et al.Neurology, January 09, 2008 -
Articles
Cladribine and progressive MSClinical and MRI outcomes of a multicenter controlled trialGeorge P. A. Rice, Massimo Filippi, Giancarlo Comi et al.Neurology, March 14, 2000 -
Articles
Patient-centered outcomesTranslating clinical efficacy into benefits on health-related quality of lifeDeborah Miller, Richard A. Rudick, Michael Hutchinson et al.Neurology, April 26, 2010 -
Articles
The Multiple Sclerosis Functional CompositeA clinically meaningful measure of disabilityChris H. Polman, Richard A. Rudick et al.Neurology, April 26, 2010