Abstract
To study the temporal aspect of visual processing of senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (SDAT), we recorded the steady-state visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to LED goggle stimulation at five different temporal frequencies in 14 patients with SDAT and 14 control subjects. For comparison, we also studied 14 patients with vascular dementia (VD). All subjects were women, and their ages were closely matched. Temporal frequencies were 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 Hz. The steady-state VEPs were Fourier analyzed, and both the amplitude and phase of the first and second harmonic responses were obtained. There was a significant difference in the amplitude across the three groups for stimulation at 15, 20, and 30 Hz, but no difference at a stimulation of 5 and 10 Hz. Multiple comparison tests revealed that patients with SDAT had a significantly smaller amplitude than normal controls. Patients with VD had lower amplitudes than normal subjects, but this was not statistically significant. In the phase data, there were also no statistically significant differences across the three groups for any of the temporal frequencies. These results indicate that a temporal frequency deficit exists in SDAT. This phenomenon may be explained by the pathology that affects the early stage of visual signal processing.
- © 1994 by the American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
